Sunday, May 31, 2015

First Trip to the National Theatre



A light shining in London...a view of the city

 “The theatre is irresistible; organise the theatre” was the battle cry of the big dreamers who first began clamoring for a National Theatre in Britain. Today, their vision lies on the South Bank of the Thames, a beautiful example of an organized effort to establish theatre year round.*
Through various financial, political, and managerial dilemmas, plus two world wars that pushed the pause button on their efforts, the National Theatre Company under Laurence Olivier was created before an official building was established for them to perform in.* My favorite Shakespeare play, Hamlet, was the first play the National Theatre Company performed; they put it on at the Old Vic in October 1963. Despite the difficulties, in 1976 the Company moved in to the Denys Lasdun’s National Theatre building. Thanks to this monumental point in theatre history, the National Theatre has produced over 800 plays since, putting on 1,000 performances each year.ǂ
Friday night, we saw Caryl Churchill’s A Light Shining in Buckinghamshire for our first play at the National. The play used the English Civil War and the debates of citizens’ rights as a springboard for a wider discussion of religion and the relationship between God and worshipers. The subject matter was a little dense and slow, involving long courtroom scenes and several narrative speeches telling the audience what happened rather than performing it. The stage work, however, blew my non-theatre major mind. Although this play was admittedly not one of my favorites, I have never had as many jaw-dropping moments as I did during this one. A huge dining room table filled the stage, onto which actors climbed to act out their parts and give their speeches. Then, when the Civil War began and the new Cromwell government took over, the various actors took apart the dining room table to reveal dirt underneath. Maybe that sentence isn’t as exciting to read, but I promise, the moment they pulled out shovels and actually cracked into the hardwood of the surface to pull it up, I had to pinch myself. At the close of the show, they triggered water to fall on the actors as crashes of thunder echoed overhead.
Churchill’s play was difficult to understand because of its very dry, fragmented form of presentation. Unlike another play we watched this week called The Father that also utilized confusion and broken scenes, A Light Shining’s methodology made the play less accessible and therefore made less of an impact on me personally. It played much more to the cerebral aspect than that of entertainment. That being said, when considering what the National’s goals are, this play does not disappoint.
When the first committee began organizing its efforts for a national theatre in 1909, one of their six primary goals was “to produce new plays and to further the development of the modern drama.”* Now, the National follows a similar ideal: to reach wider audiences, “representing the widest range of voices,” and to “present an eclectic mix of new plays and classics.”ǂ This is all done in an effort to maintain a strong sense of theatre appreciation and culture for all of Britain.
Churchill’s play in that sense lives up to the National’s goals. Through the debates of characters on stage over the true essence of what God is—whether he was a judgmental, distant being or merely the goodness in each person—the actors and the audience were allowed to engage with conflicting ideas. As offensive as that can potentially be (I felt the need to squirt soap in my ears after one monologue that combined scripture preaching and curse words), it creates an environment of progress and innovation—which I believe is key to the success of liberal arts. Churchill aimed high with her ambitious subject matter, but whether it succeeded or not was not really the point. The point is that the National does not just put on one type of performance; it seeks a wide range and allows free expression of avant-garde style material. This play undoubtedly set many precedents, both in stage performance and in bold language, which further emphasizes the importance of a central theatre that reflects the changing, tumultuous world we live in.
(PS, we need an American National Theatre. If you walk away from this post with anything, that is what I hope you get.)

* means that this information was drawn from Richard Findlater’s 1977 “The Winding Road to King’s Reach” article, found at http://www.nationaltheatre.org.uk/discover-more/welcome-to-the-national-theatre/the-history-of-the-national-theatre/the-winding-road
ǂ means that this information was from the National’s website information, on the tab “About the National Theatre,” found at http://www.nationaltheatre.org.uk/discover-more/welcome-to-the-national-theatre/about-the-national-theatre


 

1 comment: